![]()
© AP
Ronnie O’Sullivan, left, the newly crowned three-time World Snooker Champion and Tiger Woods.
|
|
Published: May 08, 2008, 09:59
Balls in holes...:Who’s the best?Julian Danby |
Lunch times at Emirates Golf Club are never dull, as it is an opportunity for me to catch up with a number of colleagues. Sometimes we discuss golf but most of the time it’s an opportunity to talk sport, especially football, although it’s a sore subject in the IGLS office with the relegation of Leicester City – such a shame, boys!
During one of these riveting conversations, a certain Emirates GC executive, who shall remain anonymous, voiced his opinion that he believed that Ronnie O’Sullivan, the newly crowned three-time World Snooker Champion, was more talented than Tiger Woods, because he could play to an equal standard both right and left-handed and because snooker was a more "technically" challenging sport.
* Is Ronnie O’Sullivan better than Tiger Woods because O’Sullivan can beat his opponents both right- and left-handed? Vote in our poll.
I have shortened his statement somewhat, but it did raise an interesting question as to which sport is "technically" the most difficult?
As a huge Tiger fan and a golf professional myself (although at different ends of the profession), I was quick to defend the game. To provide some form of argument I took a look at some measurable comparisons, starting with "playing conditions".
Snooker
Golf
I also attempted to compare the basic technique in both games, but in the enormity of the challenge I failed after I had finished the following list:
Add all these differing techniques and set-up positions to the list of varying playing conditions above and I thought to myself: "Enough said, Tom."
| RSS> |
Email
this article> Printer-friendly version> |
|
Golf Blog Julian Danby is general manager of Dubai-based International Golf & Leisure Services, and secretary of the UAE Professional Golfers’ Association. |
may entries |
archives |
vote |
|
Was Noddy racist? |